Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trickyness
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 12:44, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Trickyness
Unsourced, unsupported definition. Based on Talk page, apparently based on what the authors heard some other kids say at church one day. Fan-1967 17:37, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete as non-notable, per nom - Jhinman 17:39, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- Comment It doesn't meet any of the speedy criteria. ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 17:47, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- Its not just "what some kids heard at church one day" if you were to go to our youth group, you would hear this word CONSTANTLY. Its not just a word anymore, its a way of life. I think this article should be given a chance. Let us add more stuff to it, then if you still want to delete it, then put the tag up again. Joo lee AHH nuhh 17:41, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
-
- No, the tag stays up. Wikipedia is a worldwide encyclopedia. A word that's really popular among some kids in one small church group cannot be verified from any independent reliable source, and is not notable by Wikipedia standards. -- Fan-1967 17:48, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- It is a very important word in todays northeastern society many could vouge for this important and logical statement DO NOT DELETE THIS PAGE, give us atleast 24 hours to get more people to agree with us. Wowmazing 17:43, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
-
- Being popular in one church youth group does not make it "a very important word in todays northeastern society". This is not a vote. Decisions will be made based on Wikipedia rules, not how many kids from your church group come here.Fan-1967 17:48, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- If you can find reliable sources outside of yourselves then I would suggest you take this to Wiktionary. At any rate, it does not belong here. Delete. ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 17:47, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
Speedy delete as recreation of material previously deleted by User:Postdlf, today at 17:18. -FisherQueen (Talk) 17:49, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
-
- WP:CSD#G4 only applies to articles that were previously AFD'ed, not speedied. Fan-1967 17:50, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- Hey, I didn't know that. Thanks! -FisherQueen (Talk) 17:51, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- Strong delete as non-notable and unverifiable, used only among a very small group of people. -FisherQueen (Talk) 17:53, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
Um, we're gonna move it to the Wikitionary. But please just keep this up until we transfer it. Thank you =] Joo lee AHH nuhh 17:55, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NEO. The Rambling Man 17:57, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as WP:NEO. Tony Fox (arf!) 21:13, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
