Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tribal Democracy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete without prejudice for creation of a proper article ... but I would suggest Tribal democracy as the title considering naming conventions. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 04:22, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Tribal Democracy

Tribal Democracy (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Pure Original Research Pharmboy (talk) 18:19, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete as blatant advertising. Author has been putting links to a website for the names at the bottom in other articles. --Smashville^BONK! 18:39, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Seems to like to remove AFD tags as well. Pharmboy (talk) 18:40, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

• Delete OR, seems unlikely to find citations. --NickPenguin_(contribs) 20:12, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete for now but has potential if the author/editor works hard The editor starting this topic probably has (or at least I have) some good ideas for the article. The topic is potentially notable but in it's current form is quite full of original research. This type of article probably takes a few weeks to properly write. There are sources; I've read some of them in the past (in the newspaper). From a WP policy standpoint, the rules state that article notability, not quality of the prose is the most important AFD decision. From that criteria, this is a "keep" but it needs so much work to fix the OR problem that a "delete" might be the prudent course of action for now. I'd suggest that the author/editor work on the topic in his/her sandbox and re-create the article after there are more references and the article is more concrete. Good luck on this difficult topic. The author/editor may consider editing other articles then creating easier articles first as practice. Starting a difficult article as a novice is even more difficult! Archtransit (talk) 19:57, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.