Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trent Model United Nations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-02-23 08:36Z

[edit] Trent Model United Nations

Trent Model United Nations (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Image:Seas.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (added by closing admin)

Image:Time press.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (added by closing admin)

Image:Champlain college.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (added by closing admin)

Image:International dinner2.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (added by closing admin)

Image:International dinner3.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (added by closing admin)

Image:Great Hall Panorama.JPG (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (added by closing admin)

Image:International dinner.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (added by closing admin)

Image:815.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (added by closing admin)

Is this Model UN group notable? I doubt it. N Shar 00:44, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

• Delete, seems unlikely to have any way to become notable. All that's on Google News Archive is some press releases, so fails WP:ORG. --Dhartung | Talk 00:52, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete: has no sources, so it lacks verifiability, which is non-negotiable. Also, it doesn't appear to be notable by WP:ORG. - Chardish 01:12, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Unverified, non-notable organization with no reliable sources.--TBCΦtalk? 01:42, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Little here differentiates this Model UN from hundreds of others across the world. Caknuck 01:43, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
• delete per above. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 02:01, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete This article is not needed on Wikipedia, its not notable and unsourced. Darthgriz⁹⁸ 02:15, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete NN, unsourced material. Alex43223 ^{Talk | Contribs | E-mail | C} 03:21, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:ORG. PeaceNT 09:16, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete WP:NN, WP:V and WP:ORG - it fails them all.Tellyaddict^{Editor review!} 13:35, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete university clubs are rarely notable.-- danntm ^T _C 16:58, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete patently unnotable. Not even worth a mention in the university article, because the event itself is for high-school kids, it's only held at the university. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 17:01, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Delete per WP:ORG Danski14 17:15, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. I've been to parties with more notability. Mystache 18:23, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, specifically per precedent on other Model UNs. WMMartin 10:51, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.