Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trendy asian bitch

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 02:14, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Trendy asian bitch

Not only is this a copyright violation but it's not very encyclopaedic. 509 results in google and most of them have identical text to the site this article was copied from. wikipedia entry link PdDemeter 19:52, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, not even remotely encyclopaedic. David Johnson [T|C] 20:26, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Tut, tut. Dan 20:37, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete completely unencyclopedic (unverifiable, original research, can never be NPOV, could be considered attack page). Copyvio. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-03 22:59Z
• Delete per above. NeoJustin 23:21, January 3, 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as copyvio. -- King of Hearts | (talk) 00:57, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment: copyvios can only be speedy deleted if they come from the website of a commercial content provider, which this one evidently didn't. See WP:CSD. David Johnson [T|C] 01:35, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. goodbye. Incognito 05:51, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.