Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Travis Reininger
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Speedied. --Golbez 22:12, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Travis Reininger
Has already been speedied twice under A7, but re-created. I'm bringing it here to see whether the community at large considers this person notable. He is an umpire in minor league baseball, which IMO does not meet WP:BIO's criteria for sportspeople. He also (allegedly, no source has been provided for this) won a car and money on a television game show, which is not even contemplated at WP:BIO. My vote is speedy delete (again) for nonnotability. Angr/talk 21:38, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as per CSD:G4 and A7. —LrdChaos 21:39, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per nom. Weatherman90 22:02, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. What's wrong with keeping pages like this on the site? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 38.117.238.194 (talk • contribs) 22:07, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
- Stop the afd right now and speedy I dpn't why this is being considered and i don't have a clue how this survived speedy. Reposted content, nn-bio, completely a waste of wikipedia space. J.J.Sagnella 22:14, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per nom.--Adam (talk) 22:18, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. The article claims that he is an umpire in the World Baseball classic and won $10,000 on Price is Right. While these are assertions of notability, neither establishes notability. However, if he were to continue to work as a high profile umpire, notability may well be established. Capitalistroadster 00:05, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete- textbook A7. Reyk 00:07, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.