Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trash palace
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete --JForget 23:42, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Trash palace
Just another bar--notability has not been established or even particularly asserted. No WP:RS. Author of the article also posted Tommy Moss, who works for the same company, Popstarz, that owns the bar. Author has the same name as the company, which made our WP:COI bot suspicious. Apparently this is one of a series of self-promotional business articles that were added on the same day [1]. Probably all of them should go. Qworty (talk) 04:23, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. BoL (Talk) 04:42, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Non-notable club. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 05:26, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
- Strong Delete. Non-notable club. Self-promotion. Alchemy12 (talk) 08:09, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Notability isn't shown there. Dekisugi (talk) 12:41, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 16:09, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Seems like an ad, and poorly tries to assert notability. ~EdGl 20:56, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been added to the LGBT WikiProject discussion board. -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 01:57, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 01:57, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete non-notable, advertisement. Aleta Sing 02:22, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
