Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trans-Lux

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. -- AllyUnion (talk) 07:22, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Trans-Lux

Unimportant small manufacturer, little content in article. (212.206.63.108's slightly messed-up nominations fixed Uncle G 16:52, 2005 Feb 11 (UTC))

• A mess as is, but I vote keep and expand. I might tackle this myself as I seem to recall that they had an office in or near Torrance, California at one time. They were a film distribution company prior to becoming a stock ticker manufacturer. In fact, I hit them up for a job and that's when I learned they weren't in the entertainment biz anymore (see Felix the Cat). - Lucky 6.9 00:24, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, cleanup, formerly famous. -- Jmabel | Talk 00:57, Feb 12, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.