Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tralix

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete All. Nishkid64 14:41, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Tralix

Tralix (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

The article does not establish its notability, and a web search on Tralix (800 hits) indicates that third party sources are unlikely. John Vandenberg 09:26, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages because they are also not notable:

NewsBlog (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (without prejudice) : the term is notable, but the topic in this article is not.

TEMO (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) : two unique hits

John Vandenberg 09:33, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

• Delete, created more than a year ago and still non-notable. Delete also the related pages. Mushroom (Talk) 09:32, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, it's pretty obvious this is spam. .V. (talk) 14:34, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete all in this WP:WG per nom. --Dhartung | Talk 21:10, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
• 'Delete all, advert/non notable -- Chris 73 | Talk 22:59, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per above.--Rudjek 23:12, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.