Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Traitorgate

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Woohookitty 07:39, 27 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Traitorgate

Dicdef, and POV-inherent. smoddy 22:40, 20 July 2005 (UTC)

• We could always redirect it to Traitor's Gate, if such an article exists (or to Tower of London if it doesn't). Grutness...wha? 01:17, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. POV neologism manufacture. It can be rewritten if it catches on, but it's not Wikipedia's job to help it do so. -- BD2412 ^talk 03:32, July 21, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete neologism. JamesBurns 08:36, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete When used in Valerie Plame article, it's redudant, along with Rovegate and Nadagate. If the articles aren't gotten rid of quickly, there's going to be even more duplication of Plame affair and Valerie Plame articles, which is where the stuff belongs. --rob 19:15, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. An article that labels someone that hasn't even been indicted yet in the title is certainly POV. -- OldRight 19:56, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. The article is definitely POV and redundant. -- Mister Man 20:21, 21 July 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.