Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TradingPlaces

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Deleteapparent WP:COI not addressed, WP:RS concerns not addressed, hence notability not established. Gnangarra 10:21, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] TradingPlaces

TradingPlaces (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Doesn't appear to present reliable sources to meet notability standards for web content. The article was also created by Tradingplaces (talk · contribs), suggesting a conflict of interest. Google search did not turn up sources. Wafulz 03:06, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Below are a list of online links which make reference to TradingPlaces

http://thesource.gov.au/find/career/documents/youthleap.doc
http://www.finsoc.unsw.edu.au/
http://www.perthpcug.org.au/memberslinks.html
http://clubs.uow.edu.au/websites/finance/
http://www.herman.com.au/
http://www.travismorien.com/FAQ/links.htm
http://media.arts.unsw.edu.au/s1-2002/1000/webassignurls.html
http://www.down.co.il/cgi-bin/searching?search=TRADING%20PLACES&get=sites&count2=3
http://www.ansearch.com.au/directory/au/Business_and_Finance/Online_Banking/atoz_T/page3.html
http://directory.infochoice.com.au/Investment/Superannuation/page32.html
http://www1.trading-8748fd.mo.az.pl/

• Making references to the subject and writing about the subject are two different things. We need some sort of publishings that are independent, of a non-trivial length, and are primarily about TradingPlaces.--Wafulz 11:11, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 12:16, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 12:16, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
• Keepneed some sort of publishings that are independent, of a non-trivial length, and are primarily about TradingPlaces - these things should have been discussed in the talk section of an article which is being actively edited rather than being bought to AfD. I see this software as notable for it's widespread use in Australian education sector. Garrie 21:49, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

• The best way to prove that there are sources is to provide sources. We don't define notability based on an arbitrary definition of "widespread" use.--Wafulz 21:56, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Agree that the article fails WP:NOTE. I couldn't find even a newspaper article on the software. Articles needs reliable secondary sources to be kept. Assize 11:35, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom. This clearly isn't notable.--cj | talk 05:50, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.