Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trader Workstation

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 03:47, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Trader Workstation

Trader Workstation (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Article fails WP:NOTABILITY Hu12 (talk) 23:43, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete: article fails to assert notability. Mh29255 (talk) 00:20, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
  • I believe the Trader Workstation does pass WP:NOTABILITY. It is a business software. There are many other business software articles on Wikipedia. I am not associated with Interactive Brokers in any way other than that I am a client and I use their software. I am not trying to promote the software for commercial purposes, but I do want to provide an article for other users of the software to learn about it.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Agentq314 (talk • contribs)
  • Merge/redirect to Interactive Brokers#Software (though it looks like suitable content is already there). Insufficient notability for a standalone article. Jfire (talk) 23:12, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
Create a new article. Extensive notability for a standalone article. Agentq314 12:47, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Merge and redirect at least for now. The Interactive Brokers article provides the right context for such a short article. It will always be an option later to revise this. Pichpich (talk) 02:18, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
The above doppelganger account user page states "This account is a alternate account used solely for wikignoming. As such it will never participate in community decisions, be it deletion debates, request for adminship debates, talk page disputes, etc." JERRY talk contribs 00:48, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JERRY talk contribs 00:57, 6 February 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.