Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trackdoctor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete per WP:NEO. When the website you link to to back your claim up is not only your own site but merely a placeholder page from the registrar, I'd say you fail any sort of notability. More or less stealth spam. Daniel Case 03:39, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Trackdoctor

Trackdoctor (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Article was nominated by Totnesmartin (talk · contribs) for speedy deletion as a neologism, saying that "There is no such term in sound recording". However, that is not a speedy deletion criteria. Procedural nomination; I abstain. Mike Peel 21:12, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Neologism, borderline spam. Blueboy96 22:36, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NEO - No sources that expand on the term Corpx 02:26, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Neologism. *drew 15:37, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.