Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toxic Wife Syndrome

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 00:28, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Toxic Wife Syndrome

Toxic Wife Syndrome (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable neologism. -- RHaworth 13:00, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

  • WEAK KEEP -- Slightly notable as it is on the news/reuters, you can easily search this in google/yahoo.. this is quite a universal phenomenon in the society but just no one term it yet 13:27, 8 March 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.250.49.1 (talk • contribs)
  • This is a well known set social phenomenon,and the terming of them is a unique work and this page should be preserved —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.166.160.231 (talk • contribs)
  • Weak keep, there seems to have been some sort of controversy about the coining of the phrase. But the article desperately needs sources and more information about the phrase, as opposed to just a dicdef. Natalie 15:07, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. So a British journalist has invented a pseudo-medical label for a phenomenon that's been going on since "'Omer smote 'is bloomin' lyre." This phrase needs to be shown to have longer legs before becoming notable enough to deserve an article. - Smerdis of Tlön 15:20, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - this one still appears to be a one-off neologism. There's potential for an article if the term gets taken up more widely, but that day isn't here yet. -- BPMullins | Talk 15:32, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete- spam promotion Astrotrain 16:09, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per above. What, I get some smarmy BS in print just the once and suddenly it's article-eligible? RGTraynor 16:14, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete not even close to being notable enough Lurker oi! 16:30, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Non-notable neologism spamming for a book. (Also, does he think there are no toxic husbands?) --Charlene 00:55, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. --Lmblackjack21 11:48, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.