Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Towelianism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 02:15, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Towelianism

Not notable, maybe insert into South Park  Jmatt1122  CVU ^(Talk)  19:02, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

But it's a rising social trend amongst a small group of people. It's rapidly gaining momentum in other places. In orkut, specifically. It's even becoming a social philosophy of its 20 or so followers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dakoit (talk • contribs)

It is a rather enigmous, yet quite simple meme at the confusion that the existence of religion causes. I am an active and quite so participating member of this ideology, and its presense at Wikepeida is under the free-source agreement that we are subjected to in your page. It may not be your exact and protracted ideology, and the right of alternative opinion is completely legally reserved by you, but we have not only an emotive but an intellectual need to indentify ourselves as a different section of society. A Wikipedia page would allow us to greatly enhance our idealogy's presense amongst the masses.

Why oh Why, oh Ravenous Savanna would you want Towelianism to part, Would you offer the misplaced reverence was God Almighty to fart?

Must you repel us and deny us our expression, Only 'true' muslims know the ranks of ineffective agression.

Consider this the Towelian 'Jihad', Outnumbered we are, yet we shall survive, We are the replacement cast of the movie Die-Hard. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.142.160.72 (talk • contribs)

the religion is already made. deleting it from wikipedia just denies people information about it. ~ dakoit

• Delete and don't insert into South Park per WP:NFT. Even though Towlie does kick ass. --Mr. Lefty _{Talk to me!} 19:23, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, and do not merge. MarkBuckles 19:25, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete no merge, per above. Definitely WP:NFT. -- Fan-1967 19:58, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, today's nonnotable made-up religion of the day. NawlinWiki 20:55, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Don't forget Arrogantology. --Mr. Lefty _{Talk to me!} 21:59, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, delete, DELETE. Ashibaka tock 21:53, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Mr. Lefty. —C.Fred (talk) 22:39, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. No, just no. WP:NFT. Can we please go one day without some new "religion" article?? --Kinu ^t/_c 23:06, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete with no merge. I really just don't know what to think with that great poetry above. --james^(talk) 23:13, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Delete as WP:V, WP:OR, WP:NEO and WP:NFT. Allisonmontgomery69 23:15, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as (dumbshow)religioncruft. Danny Lilithborne 01:26, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.