Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Touchyball & Crazypants

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Thryduulf 11:57, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Touchyball & Crazypants

This is the english version translation of the Spanish webcomic Picapolla y Chocholoco seen here. They are both hosted on the same domain, and that domain comes back with an Alexa rank of 350,000. Note that the webcomic is not the only thing at that domain. "Picapolla y Chocholoco" gives just over 70 links and the word touchyball gives back 12 links. I do not think that either the Spanish webcomic nor the English translation is notable. However, if it is kept, I strongly suggest having the article under the original spanish name. - Hahnchen 00:08, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

• Move to Picapolla y Chocholoco, the Spanish webcomic version appears notable enough with the Google search. AndyZ _t 01:16, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
• This has been listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject Webcomics/Deletion. –Abe Dashiell ^(t/c) 02:11, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
• Move per AndyZ. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 04:00, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. No assertion of notability. Fagstein 05:16, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
• Move, per CyberSkull..-- 陈鼎翔 贡献 Chat with Tdxiang on IRC! 09:51, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
• Move to Picapolla y Chocholoco. --Terence Ong 10:28, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete --Knucmo2 13:35, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. RGTraynor 14:04, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
• Move- notability isn't really a concern; "sum total of human knowledge" and all that. But there's no reason to treat it as separate from the Spanish language edition. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Captainktainer (talk • contribs)
  • Your position is admirable, but it's against policy. Fagstein 18:17, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. 'not notable' is not part of the deletion criteria. This article is at least stub quality, and does not violate any policies, therefore it is worth keeping. Cynical 18:29, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment - The article is written by a User:Ccbaxter, the webcomic author, probably as a vanity or promotional piece. Having an entry on Wikipedia's list of webcomics seems to be a must these days for any old webcomic. - Hahnchen 18:40, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment the 'vanity prohibition' has been routinely violated by Jimbo (among lots of other people), so it's more or less deprecated. Cynical 20:03, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, per Fagstein. RexNL 19:40, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, of little consequence. Quatloo 20:45, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Wstaffor 22:43, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 04:39, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per Fargstein. --HolyRomanEmperor 16:45, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, per Fagstein. -- Dragonfiend 18:28, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
• Comment: Please keep in mind that this is a non-english website, so there is a bias against it in the counting mechanisms. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 03:44, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.