Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Totseism

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. -Splash^talk 00:18, 26 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Totseism

• Forumcruft, and it describes a lot of words that not necessarily relate to the Totse board, like roflcopter, omgwtfbbq and many other commonly used forum statements. It's not Encyclopaedia Dramatica here, so I'm in favour of deleting the article --SoothingR 18:10, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
• This is my article, and I don't appreciate it being deleted within five minutes. It was intended as a humorous and informative expansion to the TOTSE page. -- GreatCthulhu 18:19, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
• Comment: That's all a very well, but it still doesn't make your article any more notable. --SoothingR 18:33, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom. Try Uncyclopedia. Jkelly 19:27, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as per SoothingR. -- MCB 17:52, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
• Wikipedia:Please_do_not_bite_the_newcomers, but WP:NOT "a dictionary, or a usage guide, or slang and idiom guide." No Importance outside some non-authoritative forums, and according to SoothingR no Verifiability in terms of this cruft being exclusive to the site referenced in the article title. Delete. Barno 06:39, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Barno, it strikes as a little inconsistent to admonish someone for biting, and then refer to cruft. -Splash^talk 00:18, 26 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.