Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Torture twelve

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete under WP:CSD G10 (article serves no purpose other than to disparage its subject). Guy 22:04, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Torture twelve

This article is a neologism that, by its own admission, has not appeared in any print sources, and is very nearly an attack page. I nominated it for proposed deletion, and User:Catchpole removed the tag. NatusRoma | Talk 01:35, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Neologism someone is trying to use Wikipedia promote. Unreliable sources -- the attempt at using the Government Printing Office is particularly silly. --Calton | Talk 01:41, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Neologism. - Trysha ^(talk) 01:50, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete WP:NEO --Steve 02:00, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Calton. bibliomaniac15 Review? 03:02, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. ςפקιДИτς ☺ ☻ 03:34, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Neologism - Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought --SunStar Net 10:36, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Wikipedia is not for neologisms Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 11:39, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. --Kf4bdy ^{talk contribs} 16:56, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete ~ per nom Ozzykhan 17:48, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Cbrown1023 21:15, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Audiobooks 21:34, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.