Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Too Much Power

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 03:08, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Too Much Power

De-PRODed by creator. I was going to tag for speedy deletion as advert, User:Nucleusboy PRODed and I seconded. Google search revealed 15 UNIQUE Googlehits for +"Too Much Power" +"Bret Meanor" Only 40 UNIQUE Google hits for "Bret Meanor" Do not see that subject meets notability requirements. Again, rePRODed. Taking to AfD. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 20:01, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete as non-notable. Author is pretty well nonexistent when it comes to Google results and reliable sources; the book's printed by SterlingHouse, which is apparently a vanity press. No notability to be seen here. Tony Fox (arf!) 20:25, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
• Strong delete per the fox, non-notable book by a vanity press. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?)} 21:09, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Delete Zero notability and per WP:NB. Also, it's unclear what the book is about. "A critical review of the book notes three elements: a conversational tone, a concise, easy-to-read format, and well-researched historical details." Of what?! Also, if there's a critical review, it's hiding somewhere, possibly ashamed.--Sethacus 01:10, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.