Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Stetson (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep (non-admin closure) — Caknuck 07:11, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Tony Stetson

Tony Stetson (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non notable wrestler, survived one AfD, and no changes have been made to the article to establish notability. Darrenhusted 10:53, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

• Keep Subject has won three championship awards with ECW, a notable wrestling organization, including two world championships. There's a reason this survived a previous AfD.--Ispy1981 11:14, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletions. —Darrenhusted 11:28, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
• Comment he survived becuase no one voted against it. The article needs to be improved. Darrenhusted 11:28, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NOTE. Winning a couple of titles (one of them very minor) is not enough to establish notability. See other entries on the List of ECW Tag Team Champions article for wrestlers that do/do not rate an entire article (eg Stevie Richards). EyeSerene^TALK 12:04, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment, I don't understand what you mean. Are you saying Stevie Richards does or doesn't deserve an article? The man was given the WWE Hardcore Championship 22-times. I think that's a bad example, as he probably deserves an article. Nikki311 01:19, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
• Keep: Sorry, a two-time ECW tag champion passes the BIO bar. The article doesn't need to be padded just out of an aesthetic sense of how big a legit article needs to be.  RGTraynor  15:29, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
• Keep For reasons given by RGTraynor. --DanZero 15:35, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
• Keep, seams someone has it out against wrestlers they seam to all be getting AfD. He is notable. Callelinea 16:03, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
• Comment, it isn't that someone has something against wrestlers, it's that many wrestler were discussed and agrred they weren't notable and should be PROD-ed, then a bunch of editors who feel they own some articles decided to remove the PRODs and force an AfD. Darrenhusted

• Reply: I can't imagine why anyone would figure that removing a prod on some of these could only come from sinister motives ... and, come to that, not all of the articles you AfDed today were prodded. The actual discussion on the wrestling Wikiproject was more of a "I'm considering prodding these fifty names, anyone object?"  RGTraynor  20:31, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
• Comment ...and looking back no one spoke up to keep. Since surviving the AfD in April there was one edit made, and after the PROD was removed there we no edits made. Darrenhusted 21:16, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

• Uhhh.....keep How in the world could you fathom he's not notable? He's won the tag team title. --sumnjim ^{talk with me·changes} 16:19, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
• Keep, he won the ECW Tag Team Championship twice, so I do think he is notable. However, I agree that the page needs to be cleaned up and sources need to be added. Nikki311 23:47, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment, I just cleaned up the article and added some more information that will hopefully establish his notability better. Nikki311 01:19, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.