Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Bushby

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Singularity 01:08, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Tony Bushby

Tony Bushby (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Article about a writer created by an SPA. Read this review of his main book. -- RHaworth 09:31, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Recurring dreams 11:11, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. I actually removed the CSD tag from this and declined to speedy it because I thought it was best for the community to decide its fate and because there seemed to be some assertion of notability. There are over 19,000 ghits but all seem to be either promotional or from quack-like websites. He tries to ride the coattails of Dan Brown and The DaVinci Code but has failed to garner the same kind of notability. JodyB _{yak, yak, yak} 11:30, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Non-notable conspiracy nut.--Sethacus 16:37, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
• Okay, . . . maybe The Bible Fraud is not a best-selling book. Delete. --Evb-wiki 18:35, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Google News Archives comes up with three hits, two of which appear to be letters to the editor of a Sydney suburban newspaper and what appears to be a trivial mention in the Cairns Post. [1] There don't seem to be sources of sufficient strength to establish notaility. Capitalistroadster 03:00, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.