Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tontie

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. IceKarmaॐ 01:06, 26 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Tontie

It's just another flash cartoon that does not state why the game is important. Google check gives me about 44,400 hits, but mostly to places that talk about flash games or download flash games. Delete Zach (Sound Off) 00:38, 18 September 2005 (UTC)

• Weak keep - a flash cartoon that gets that many google hits strikes me as notable. Guettarda 01:20, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per the Ten-Year Rule. Denni☯ 02:18, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
• keep per google hits, and the rule that in 10 years' time people will want to know about the history of popular flash games. Kappa 03:12, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. – AxSkov (☏) 05:08, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. I don't think I'd vote to keep any flash game article, no matter how old. People can have their fun in... that's right... Internet game. Wikipedia is not a directory of non-notable internet gimmicks. / Peter ^Isotalo 16:39, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per 10 year rule. — Phil Welch 21:38, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, popular flash games may require articles, but this is a cheap rip-off of whack-a-mole. This is NOT popular. - Mgm|^(talk) 21:58, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete but this Flash game designer is definitely notable; his odd games are fairly well-known-enough and a cult success to be considered encyclopedic, especially his GROW series. Delete this article and make a new one about this individual and his productions and move the information about this game into there. While this Flash game is encyclopedic, there isn't enough information you can really cover about it to give it its own dedicated article. Stubs are... annoying. --I am not good at running 07:29, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. -Sean Curtin 23:34, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable. Dottore So 15:35, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
• Merge as per I am not good at running's comment ··gracefool |☺ 07:23, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.