The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy delete g11, blatant advertising, no prejudice to reposting if the article is written in a neutral tone and provides sources. -- NawlinWiki (talk) 21:14, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Moved from speedy since there is at least some coverage from news (eg), but article still appears to fail WP:BIO. -- TeaDrinker (talk) 21:05, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.