Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tommy Bowden

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. --Holderca1 03:08, 6 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Tommy Bowden

No firm assertion of notability and probable vanity. Note that page has only been edited by anon IPs (not that this is a reason to delete). No opinion. -- Rune Welsh | ταλκ | Esperanza 18:04, 1 November 2005 (UTC)

• Strong Keep Tommy Bowden is real! He's head football coach at Clemson.--Alhutch 18:35, 1 November 2005 (UTC)

• Comment I fixed a few things in the article. If you want to know whether he's notable, simply do a google search. this article needs to be kept.--Alhutch 18:51, 1 November 2005 (UTC)

• Keep, expand, and cleanup. I've tagged this because it needs attention (record vs University of South Carolina is random factoid at best). Still, he is a head coach of a moderately notable school, at least as far as NCAA football is concerned.--Isotope23 18:53, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep after cleanup by Alhutch. -- Rune Welsh | ταλκ | Esperanza 19:10, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep expand and cleanup. Notable football coach at a university with a notable football program. Capitalistroadster 19:29, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and expand. He is notable notable. Carioca 21:25, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep as per Isotope23. Hall Monitor 22:57, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, expand and cleanup per Isotope23. He has been a head football coach in the top division of college football for eight years. --Metropolitan90 01:45, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
• Strong strong strong keep, most certainly not vanity. Highly notable. zellin t / c 04:25, 4 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.