Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tomb Raider Outfits

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 02:52, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Tomb Raider Outfits

I think this is far above the level of detail we need to know about Tomb Raider in here. Hirudo 19:07, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

• Comment - It already had a merge tag on it, but I don't think it's worth merging -- Hirudo 19:08, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete LaraCruft Dlyons493 Talk 19:13, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Whoever wrote this may merge some of the info to Lara Croft. I don't think this is "Cruft," but this topic doesn't stand on its own as an article. It should be a section in the Lara Croft article. Mangojuice^talk 20:29, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete WP:NOT Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. ^BigE1977 23:00, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Bige1977. Tijuana Brass^¡Épa!-E@ 23:01, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete LaraCruft indeed. If there's anything worth merging into articles on Tomb Raider or Lara Croft, go ahead and do that first. Darquis 23:32, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• Merge and delete information into Lara Croft, and let editors used to that article decide if there is something worth keeping. -- ReyBrujo 04:14, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
• Merge and delete as per ReyBrujo. Severely disappointed that dlyons493 got to the 'LaraCruft' comment before me. Hornplease 05:55, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, possibly merge also. Kuzaar 15:56, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete This is another one of those deprods from Kappa (talk · contribs), who removed 24 "prod" tags on the same day he removed this one. --John Nagle 18:00, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per my own comments on the discussion area. I just wish users like Kappa would understand that a prod isn't an insult toward the article or those who worked on it, but is rather a 'prod' to get those who care to work on it and preserve it. By deprodding things, Kappa's only assuring that they are likely to be deleted. At this point, we might as well set a wiki-wide macro that sets an afd on anything Kappa deprods. 204.69.40.7 13:34, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. San Saba 15:38, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.