Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tomato Adventure

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was nomination withdrawn -- Hirudo 01:25, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Tomato Adventure

It's just another videogame. Nothing notable about it that would warrant an article Hirudo 01:00, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

• Withdraw Afd per all the comments below, though I find it very troubling that all published video games woudl be considered notable. -- Hirudo 01:23, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

• Keep Published, that's notable enough for me. --InShaneee 01:01, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - there's nothing wrong with having it here. I worry that AfD voting can get overenthusiastic sometimes. The game is published by Nintendo. It's notable. - Richardcavell 01:02, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Videogames created and published by major manufacturers tend to be inherently notable. -- Captain Disdain 01:07, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. -- ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 01:15, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per other Keep comments. ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 01:15, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep This is a fully notable subject. It deserves a wiki page.  Heltec  talk 

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.