Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Wyka

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Nearly Headless Nick 09:20, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Tom Wyka

Tom Wyka (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Candidate for U.S. Representative who seems to have lost his election and has no other reason for notability Deville (Talk) 03:06, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Weak keep This doesn't warrant a deletion. Split Infinity (talk) 03:24, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. MER-C 05:05, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Losing an election does not cause a person to lose nobility IMO. Somitho 05:40, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Neither does it make one notible. Pastordavid 06:46, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom - also rans don't gain notariety by losing. SkierRMH,08:15, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete unless notability can be shown, as already stated, standing and losing is not notable. Nuttah68 15:38, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete I believe I read somewhere on wp a debate on inclusion of election candidates. I do recall reading that notability, at once established cannot be lost. However, my vote would be not to include election candidates unless they are otherwise notable. Thus, in this case, I would have supported deletion before the election. Alan.ca 15:47, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, nothing here but an educated guy and an expired campaign platform. Deizio talk 16:36, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete No longer notable or relevant. Preserving this sort of information should be done by original sources. - Justin (Authalic) 07:58, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - failed election candidate. -- Whpq 22:21, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.