Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Nipp (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. -- Longhair\^talk 08:59, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Tom Nipp

Tom Nipp (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable. No consensus was reached when this was nominated a couple of years ago, but notability has still not been established. StAnselm (talk) 12:33, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete - Fails WP:BIO in respect to politicians. Only a local politician, has a mention is the list of mayors of New Castle, but does not warrant an independent article Fritzpoll (talk) 12:46, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:BIO -- doesn't appear from Google to be any independent coverage of him, just coverage mentioning him in his role as mayor. Buddy Cianci, on the other hand...--uɐɔlnʌɟoʞǝɹɐs 16:53, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete, fails WP:BIO, even fails my personal generous standard for mayors of cities over 100,000 (New Castle is around pop. 18,000). --Dhartung | Talk 23:27, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 00:37, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 00:38, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - No evidence of substantial coverage by third party reliable sources, and no claim to inherent notability under WP:BIO or any other guideline. No prejudice against re-creation in the event that required coverage is demonstrated. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 02:48, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete, mayor of small town, WP:BIO#Politicians says must be mayor of major metropolitan city. Noble Sponge (talk) 05:51, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Comment. Actually, it doesn't. At least, I don't think so. I think it refers to "mayors" and then also "council members of major metropolitan cities". Maybe the ambiguity needs to be fixed. StAnselm (talk) 12:57, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

NOTE: Noble Sponge has been confirmed per checkuser as a sock account. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 17:20, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.