Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Fleming
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. W.marsh 21:39, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Tom Fleming
Fails WP:BIO, non notable and books published by him do not automatically make him notable RHB Talk - Edits 17:20, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep but expand - I'd say his list of publications, many published by reputable and notable publishing houses, is sufficient evidence of notability. However, the current article is awful and much more info is needed. Walton monarchist89 17:41, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
- Weak keep if the article is not improved it will be back here within a month Alf photoman 22:03, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Per WP:BIO. Publishing multiple instructional books does not make him notable. This comes across as a self-promotional page, and the complete listing of books is way excessive. Wikipedia is not a publisher's catalog. EdJohnston 07:20, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
