Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Emanski

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. bainer (talk) 00:19, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Tom Emanski

Funny stuff. BJAODN. - EurekaLott 00:05, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

It still needs work, but the revised version is a vast improvement. Keep. - EurekaLott 15:52, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. (or BJAODN) Not as notable as the article pretends, although some of the information is true (Tom Emanski seems to actually exist.) N Shar 02:41, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. This is not notable.--csloat 02:52, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, well-known videos, well-known youth baseball coach. [1] [2] [3] [4] There's even a nation called the Republic of Tom Emanski at NationStates. User:Zoe|^(talk) 03:42, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, per Zoe, also interviewed in baseballworld.com [5]. Kappa 04:01, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Perfectly notable figure. Grandmasterka 08:42, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Per Zoe -- DaGizza ^Chat 10:20, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep, but edit to read less like an ad. Robin Johnson 16:40, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep: creator of well-known baseball skills videos. - squibix 17:58, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
• keep please zoe is right this is notable Yuckfoo 22:55, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, per Zoe, passes WP:BIO. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 07:28, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Zoe and squibix. MKaiserman 14:07, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

Went ahead and did some major rewrites on the site adding more information, removing a few stretched claims. Still needs more work to back up some of the info (especially the last paragraph), but he is no-question a Keep MKaiserman 14:53, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.