Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tobias Halligan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE — Gwalla | Talk 05:20, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Tobias Halligan

Hoax. -- Longhair | Talk 10:07, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete -- Longhair | Talk 10:07, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Ambi 10:20, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete hoax. JamesBurns 11:06, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep -- 'JoJo 13:29, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)JoJo'
  • Keep -- Bad ambi! Jamesss 13:37, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep CzechPartisan
Comment: CzechPartisan's only edits are to VfD. -- Longhair | Talk 13:41, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Comment: Longhair's comments to other users opinions comes after he has voted himself on a topic, bringing his impartiality into question Jamesss 13:51, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Comment: My comments correctly point out, this user has never edited, until now, here. -- Longhair | Talk 13:54, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • commentFargomargo dudes, any organisation that is based on volunteers shouldn't then say mean stuff about those volunteers.
  • Keep Fargomargo

Keep Matthewleung87 14:09, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC) Any organisation which is a group on anonymous amatuers shouldn't criticise of defame other anonymous people.- 'JoJo 14:12, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)JoJo'

  • Delete - sockpuppets attack! Proto 14:33, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete and do something about the hoax vandal(and his sockpuppets) Columbia 14:50, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)
  • Uh-oh! These sockpuppets are armed with "weapons-grade Bolognium" (Qubert Farnsworth). Delete jglc | t | c 15:11, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, hoax. Alphax τεχ 15:11, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete --Habap 15:12, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete for the obvious reasons. --Etacar11 16:15, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep obvious reasons- 'Hotpants 07:03, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)Hotpants'
    • Users only edits are to vote keep on Longhair's VFD nominations. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:12, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete - Sockpuppet-backed hoax. --FCYTravis 09:10, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Evidence? Where do they say that? Until I see strong evidence to draw this into disrepute it's just one anonymous persons word against anothers. Keep- 'Freezer 09:41, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)Freezer'
  • Delete - Rubbish backed up by arty sockpuppets. And yes, block them. Burden of proof is not on us - Skysmith 10:40, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Yep, burden of proof is not on you to show anything at all, just say 3 times "sockpuppets, sockpuppets, sockpuppets" and they shall be banned. I don't think asking for adecent argument/evidence is too much- 'TagTeam 10:45, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)TagTeam' oh, and Keep
    • Another believed sockpuppet. Created account today. Sjakkalle (Check!) 10:50, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.