Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/To imagination

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted by NawlinWiki. MER-C 03:57, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] To imagination

WP:NOT - not a free web host, the author should get a blog. Fredrick day 09:47, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

• Delete, speedy if possible. Not encyclopædic. Lankiveil 10:34, 15 April 2007 (UTC).
• Delete, I originally PRODed this citing WP:OR CIreland 11:28, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. This is written as a school essay, not an encyclopedia article. —Celithemis 11:32, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - Wikipedia is not a poor quality amateur literary criticism service. - iridescenti (talk to me!) 17:42, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Doczilla 17:41, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete I'm sure this meets at least one of the criteria. Rackabello 20:57, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Not Speedy Which? the faults mentioned (OR, essay) are not speedy criteria. DGG 01:33, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.