Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/To Finster with Love

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Recess episodes#Season 1: 1997-1998. If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 03:20, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] To Finster with Love

To_Finster_with_Love (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

Fails to establish notability. Postcard Cathy 12:56, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 11:54, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

• Keep This is an episode of a television series. It's pretty easily established that it could be expanded the same as any other television series's episodes can be expanded. So it's a stub. Stub isn't a reason for deletion. At the most, redirect to List of Recess episodes pending further expansion. FrozenPurpleCube 19:59, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep There is a consensus to improve and not delete articles like this at WP:EPISODE. You can redirect them if you want, as well. These Recess episodes are being completed, but slowly. - Peregrine Fisher 20:24, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - notable television series, the consensus is to improve these articles, not delete them. Matthew 20:27, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete A detailed reading of the discussion page at the centralized discussion leads me to the conclusion that there was not consensus for stub articles for epsodes, but rather for only general articles until there was sufficient material to break it out into session articles, and then eventually into ones for each episode. These articles are none of them even approaching the stage of individual episode articles. The discussion frequently referred to school articles as a model, and I think its clear that discussions here are against individual articles until the material is sufficient. The bulk of the discussion was some months ago, and there were notes at the end that the consensus in the more generally interested WP community was moving against episode articles. At any rate, it behooves us to state our independent views here. I note that this particular articlew is two sentences long. Speedy as empty is my view. DGG 04:24, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
• Comment - This should have been a part of a mass nomination along with Space Cadet (Recess episode), Stand Up Randall (Recess episode), Terrifying Tales of Recess, That Stinking Feeling (Recess episode), The A.V. Kid, The Barnaby Boys (Recess episode), The Bet (Recess episode), The Break Up (Recess episode), The Challenge (Recess episode), The Coolest Heatwave Ever, The Girl was Trouble (Recess episode), The Legend of Big Kid, The Lost Ball (Recess episode), The Principals of Golf, The Ratings Game (Recess episode), The Shiner (Recess episode), The Substitute (Recess episode), To Finster with Love, Tucked In Mikey, and Randall's Reform. In defense of some of these articles, they weren't linked to from the episode list. Basically, the ones that were linked to got improved, and the other ones didn't. - Peregrine Fisher 18:41, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.