Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiverton Town F.C. season 2007-08

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --Haemo 23:36, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Tiverton Town F.C. season 2007-08

Tiverton Town F.C. season 2007-08 (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

A single season of a non-notable team in a not very notable division. OZOO (What?) 17:54, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Non-professional teams should definitely not have season-by-season articles. пﮟოьεԻ 57 18:05, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - To refer to Tiverton Town F.C. as a non-notable team is a bit harsh, as they must be fairly notable to have a Wikipedia article about them. However, I will agree that they are not notable enough to have articles written about their individual seasons. - PeeJay 18:15, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete NOt notable enough and isn't fully professional. Reywas92^Talk 18:29, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
• Comment I would suggest that Torrington F.C. season 2007-08 be added to this debate, as that team plays its football at a much lower level than Tiverton.... ChrisTheDude 21:12, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
  • I agree. I can't even believe someone went to the trouble of creating that article! By the way, what about Esteghlal F.C. 2007-08 Season and Sepahan F.C. 2007-08 Season? Are they notable enough? - PeeJay 23:58, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
    • I favour deleting all current season articles, but at least Esteghal and Sepahan are members of the top division of Iranian football, and should be treated in much the same way as members of the top division of European leagues. - fchd 07:36, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
      • Yes, that they are. I simply skimmed through the category and picked out names I didn't recognise. - PeeJay 14:11, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
• Keep If the team's notable, then so are their stats. Da-rb 21:23, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
• Comment WP:Football need to address the Season by Season requirements for clubs as well. Da-rb 21:23, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete I would rather put it the way that if their players are notable, then their stats might be as well. Punkmorten 21:55, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Season by season team articles are absurd. Decoratrix 00:40, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete & Comment Non-professional teams should not have season by season articles, which is why I also suggest adding Tamworth F.C. season 2007-08 to the debate. Simon KHFC 00:26, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - all "current season" articles - clear examples of recentism. - fchd 07:35, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
• Keep The team is notable and the article is verified as well. Moreover, having this article in Wikipedia is important as it contains useful information on the history of this club. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 03:58, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
• Keep The team notable, they have a Wikipedia article after all, so why not a seasn article? A notable team, a notable league, it should be kept most definetly, its harsh to want to delete it just because they are a lower league club. Andre666 10:13, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete A notable league does not mean that all clubs in the league are notable. Therefore, just because a club is notable, it does not mean that they would have notable season-by-season pages. I really don't think detailed season-by-season pages for level 7 clubs need to be on Wikipedia -- that's what club websites are for. --Balerion 14:45, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per PeeJay and Simon. --Angelo 21:38, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.