Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Titular county

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 06:43, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Titular county

Procedural nom b/c reprodded. See lengthy rationale for deletion on article talk. - CrazyRussian talk/email 11:56, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete the prod reason (although initially disputed) seems to sum it up: "this article seems mainly to consist musing on what Vision of Britain mean by the term. it doesn't appear anywhere else and would seem to be a neologism." Yomangani^talk 12:06, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete At Talk:Titular_county it was explained that this is a neologism that seems not to have meaning outside the 'Vision of Britain' database. There is no incentive to bend the Wikipedia rules to add this to the world as a useful term, because it isn't useful. Some UK counties have a confusing way of referring to themselves, but this doesn't solve the problem. (Any attempt to define what 'Titular counties' really are immediately gets counterexamples). EdJohnston 14:10, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Mrsteviec 19:37, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above (my original prod message sums it up) gah - what does it take to get rid of this page? i should have just deleted it per Talk:titular county :) Morwen - Talk 20:04, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.