The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Flowerparty☀ 02:49, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
Not sure if it is worthy. Better than to be speed'ed -- Szvest 19:07, 16 April 2006 (UTC)Wiki me up™
Delete - advertisement for something or other. Defo not encyclopedic. Wickethewok 19:18, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
Delete, blatant ad. Haikupoet 03:17, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.