Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tir'su

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was MERGE. dbenbenn | talk 23:18, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Tir'su

Non-notable, unverifiable, or possibly a prank, as it's VERY difficult to believe anything connected to D&D would have zero hits. "Tir'su" githyanki=0 and "Tir'su" dragons=1 unrelated. Niteowlneils 21:38, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)

• Delete Hoax at worst, 20sideddicecruft at best, but tiramisu is delicious. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 22:10, Feb 6, 2005 (UTC)
• Delicious. Er, delete. Almost certainly someone's homegrown extension, ie original "research". —Korath (Talk) 22:40, Feb 6, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. I agree with Niteowlneils' argument. JoaoRicardo 03:18, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Keep or merge into the githyanki article, along with the reference as to where this stuff came from. This seems to be right on the border of "official", Dragon magazine's had a lot of stuff come through its pages that wound up in future sourcebooks. Bryan 07:32, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• This is no hoax, read my editorial note on the origin of the term. --- Samuel M. Wright (169.232.227.204)
• Merge and redirect to Githyanki. —Korath (Talk) 22:46, Feb 7, 2005 (UTC)
• Merge/redirect Kappa 02:05, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect. Far, far too minor to merit its own article. -Sean Curtin 03:07, Feb 8, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep otherwise Merge and redirect to Githyanki. Megan1967 05:37, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete: gamecruft. Wile E. Heresiarch 04:39, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect Gamaliel 04:43, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.