Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tinny mish
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. --Ryan Delaney talk 07:57, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Tinny mish
Some guys walking and drinking. DJ Clayworth 14:01, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
- Keep it the pub crawl is just people going to pubs and drinking but that is on. I don't see why our tradition can't be included and noticed. shaneo619
- Pub crawls are notable because they are something that people around the world (or at least in English-speaking countries) recognize and do. Can you provide some evidence that "tinny mish" is a well-known phenomenon, and not just something your group of friends do? If so, I'll support you to keep this. Until then, delete. Nandesuka 15:08, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Unverifiable and not notable. Capitalistroadster 15:18, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete no Google hits, so it's unverifiable for a start. Sounds fun though. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:27, August 9, 2005 (UTC)
- Why does it have to be a "phenomenon". I don't understand why you're so dead set against its inclusion. I don't see why we can't share our different traditions. shaneo619
- Please understand that it isn't anything personal, just that an encyclopedia isn't the place to share one's own personal traditions. It isn't that it's a bad tradition, just that this isn't the place for it. Encyclopedic content must, at a very minimum, be verifiable: for example, mentioned in the press, referenced in books, that sort of thing. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 16:50, August 9, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. If 4000 people do it every year, it's "notable". If 4 do it, it isn't. Maybe http://www.uncyclopedia.org might be the place? Tonywalton 19:51, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete bizarre. NN/unverified. --Etacar11 00:29, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.