Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timway (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedily deleted by RHaworth (talk • contribs • blocks • protects • deletions • moves • rights) with reason "empty". Non-admin close. cab 05:15, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Timway

Timway (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This article survived deletion review claiming that there were sources to assert its notability. It's steadily gone downhill. It's now a mere shell with a product/feature listing. If it weren't for the AfD/DRV history, I'd probably speedy delete it as a non-notable website. As it is, notability per WP:WEB is not proven. There are no assertions in the body of the article about the notability and no sources cited in the article itself to support the notability. —C.Fred (talk) 02:09, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

• Comment. Yikes. Be careful googling this thing, there're like 500 other Timways out there... Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps)))} 02:20, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete 76,000 Yahoo hits--but not a reliable source among them. Blueboy96 03:12, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete In the time given since DRV, nothing happened. Effectively a db-repost, since there hasn't been an attempt to improve it at all. There were copyvios though.... Giggy _U^CP 03:17, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
• Comment A source [1] has been left on the talk page which contains detailed analysis of the characteristics of queries given to them. On this basis, I'd suggest no prejudice against recreation as a non-copyvio article. (I voted for deletion on the last AfD, but changed my mind mainly due to the above source). cab 15:31, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete: If there are sources, then the article is the correct place for the information and the references, not the talk page or the Deletion Review page. This article has been given more than enough opportunity to assert its subject's notability, and those interested in it have failed to do so. Without evidence of notability in the article, the Wikipedia policy is to assume no notability and to delete. Hu 15:54, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.