Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timucin Leflef

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy delete. Royboycrashfan 02:49, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Timucin Leflef

"Timucin Leflef does not really exist." The first line says it all Srikeit^{(talk ¦ ✉)} 04:11, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

• No Vote. May have potential if sources are given and the information is expanded upon. At the current moment, the article is mostly useless. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 04:28, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom; "potential" for what, exactly? There are nine G-hits for the name, all for a director at a place called Lightfilms.com. RGTraynor 06:32, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
    • When I'm on the Wikipedia when I should be sleeping, my writing remains coherent whilst my ideas do not. Delete -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 16:44, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete not notable and no claims thereof. Morgan Wick 05:09, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete absolute crap, unless he is the fellow involved in films who is the only person found via Google. SM247 06:43, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete per nom and Morgan Wick. Paddles ^T_C 08:13, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• delete as hoax. --Aleph-4 12:38, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete A7' Terence Ong 14:09, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete per nom. Xyrael ^T 16:44, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.