Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timpanogas Regional Hospital

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No Consensus to delete. Eluchil404 08:11, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Timpanogas Regional Hospital

I am also nominating the following related pages because like the main article, they are all non-notable hospitals in Utah, and were created by the same editor at around the same time:

Subject seems to be non-notable. For a majority of the pages, there is no considerable text on the page aside from the hospital's location and its phone number. Others have text that seems to have been picked from another source, and may be a copyright violation. Additionally, these read a great deal like advertisements. The creator has been creating a number of articles all related to hospitals in Utah, all of which seem to be non-notable. — HelloAnnyong [ t · c ] 06:51, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Delete non-notable hospitals. Bobby1011 07:53, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, W.marsh 15:01, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Delete non-notable hospitals. TonyBallioni 15:18, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete them all. I agree. JohnCD 20:15, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Keep WP:N is clear on this, and WP:ORG doesn't contradict it: If there are multiple, independent, reliable sources giving nontrivial coverage, the subject is notable. Because hospitals are so important in the lives of people and in communities, it's hard for them NOT to be notable. They often generate plenty of coverage. The first hospital listed here recently had several newspaper articles written about it, as anyone can see here. Where sources are not now in the articles, they can be found. Noroton 23:38, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Comment: But they're not all like that. In a Google news search, the main article I listed yields no results. Should we just pick and choose from the list? As a side comment, the editor who created these articles just created them and ran away without making any attempt to clean up the articles. — HelloAnnyong [ t · c ] 15:23, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Keep per Nortoton. These are far too many articles to batch AfD and some of these, Ogden Regional Medical Center and Utah Valley Regional Medical Center for examples, are very major hospitals serving large population centers. These aren't little clinics in the woods. --Oakshade 07:58, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
Keep. Clearly hospitals are notable. I did a bunch of tagging and added a cat for these. They probably need to be tagged for references. This just makes the articles of poor quality and they are still notable. Vegaswikian —Preceding comment was added at 10:28, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
Keep. As per noroton. Kingturtle 17:34, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timpanogas Regional Hospital

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Timpanogas Regional Hospital

Views

Navigation

Interaction

Search