Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timothy Patrick O'Connell

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 05:12, Jan 16, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Timothy Patrick O'Connell

Yet another vanity page. A bit too long to speedy as short and contextless, unfortunately. Shimeru 22:49, Jan 2, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete vanity. Rje 00:41, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Vanity, nonsense (but not quite patent nonsense). Ливай | ☺ 00:51, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Gzornenplatz 00:53, Jan 3, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, vanity page. Megan1967 00:56, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as silly pimple puff... vanity. Wyss 03:07, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete I feel sorry for this kid. Brownman40 05:06, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete see above--Boothy443 05:07, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. vanity smurf, and I do not feel sorry for him. Cleduc 07:42, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. While it's not well written, it is factual--66.210.102.254 12:56, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Vanity. Jayjg | (Talk) 21:12, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.