Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timothy Koh
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. PeaceNT 04:24, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Timothy Koh
Article may be making a thin claim of notability with his positions, so I'm not going to speedy delete it. But I don't think he's notable enough to pass WP:BIO. Most sources given are generic (like a ref to http://www.credit-suisse.com/ ), of the two external links at the end, one is broken and one has a short paragraph where he was asked a question. ··coelacan 05:32, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Delete (speedy if possible) --- IMO there is no assertion of notability here. Being a lower-level exec for a bunch of companies is nothing special. This is also probably WP:COI --- created by Kohklt (talk · contribs). 404 GHits, GNews archive search shows 5 trivial quotes in magazines, nothing which actually has Koh as its primary subject (e.g. a profile). [1] Wikipedia is not LinkedIn. cab 05:52, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per above. —dustmite 06:09, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per above. I add that Kohklt (talk · contribs) is a single purpose account. Victoriagirl 22:32, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
- Comment even more amusingly, 198.240.133.75 (talk • contribs • info • WHOIS), who has edited the article several times recently, comes from a Credit Suisse proxy server [2]; the probability that it's Mr. Koh himself is approaching 100%. Sadly, he's hardly the worst editor from that IP address either. Perhaps someone in a really nasty mood might see fit to enquire with Credit Suisse's HR department as to why their employees have nothing better to do on company time than vandalise Wikipedia ... cab 12:09, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.