Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timing mark

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP as rewritten. -Splash^talk 20:14, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Timing mark

Seems to serve no purpose; links to French articles go nowhere Jim62sch 03:28, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Sulfur 05:31, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Keep, now that the content has changed. Sulfur 18:22, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, fails to establish context or importance. Link to OMR goes to a disambig page, Interwiki articles at fr: do not exist. JIP | Talk 10:59, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep as rewritten. JIP | Talk 08:24, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Lacks context; might change my mind if some were added. --Cymsdale 12:18, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Abstain Removing my delete vote after article change. --Cymsdale 14:37, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

I have now rewritten the article to be about two uses of timing mark, one being on an engine flywheel, the other being on an OMR sheet. I won't vote since it's now "my" content. Just zis Guy you know? 14:27, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

• Merge & redirect to top dead centre. -- Krash (Talk) 22:36, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep the rewrite. Stifle 13:41, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.