Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Time's Champion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect. Based on the sources presented in this discussion, the sentence at Craig Hinton is sufficient.-Wafulz (talk) 15:12, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Time's Champion

Time's Champion (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable unsourced fan-project —TreasuryTag—t—c 21:02, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

• Delete per the nominator, does not meet notability standards. coccyx bloccyx_(toccyx) 21:14, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

• Delete per nom - non-notable, does not meet notablity standards (and I was going to AFD it myself). --87.113.70.64 (talk) 22:16, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

• Merge and redirect to Craig Hinton. I wish this were notable enough to get its own article, and maybe it will be after publication. But (from a quick search), I can at least find a source saying Craig was working on this: ([1] towards the bottom of the page in the section on Craig's death). Andu due to the circumstances of its publication it's probably worth a mention there. -- SonicAD (talk) 05:46, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

An addendum... transwiki to the TARDIS Index File probably would be a good idea as well. -- SonicAD (talk) 17:06, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

• Redirect to Craig Hinton and include brief information about this in that article. Jasynnash2 (talk) 10:21, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 17:20, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 17:20, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
• Keep - this is not a fan project by normal definitions of the term. Phil Sandifer (talk) 19:08, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

• It's still a non-notable fan project, even if by abnormal definitions of the term. —TreasuryTag—t | c 19:22, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

If you are going to use abnormal definitions of "notable" and "fan project" the onus is really on you to describe it. I see a project that has the involvement of a notable press in the relevant area (Telos in Doctor Who) with a notable author in the area (Hinton, who has numerous other books published). That seems like something that probably will satisfy notability, making, according to WP:N, deletion without effort to find sources undesirable. Keeping and allowing better sourcing to be found is thus preferable. Phil Sandifer (talk) 21:19, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

• Delete per nomJ293339 (talk) 18:48, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
• Merge per User:SonicAD.  Frank  |  talk  13:46, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.