Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim sansom

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was

Speedy delete per admin/CSD A7.--Andeh 19:33, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Tim sansom

Patently nonsense vanity page. Was speedied by tag was removed Nuttah68 16:23, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete vanity page, indeed. It should be {{db-bio}} joturner 16:42, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Vanity page. "Tim Sansom ... has popularity been credited with the invention of the bubble for the spirit level.". The spirit level article begs to differ. If Mr. Samson does believe he invented the spirit level then he was three hundred years too late. --IslaySolomon 16:47, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment Oh, also probably best not to describe this article as "potent nonsense" or some petty admin may subject you to a humiliating dressing-down. --IslaySolomon 16:50, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment. Really? I was happy to use patent nonsense (CSD G1) as the contents are, less happy with vanity as I have no idea if Tim Sansom b1980 exists and even if he does whether he created the article :) Nuttah68 17:17, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment Looks like I'm willing to take the risk.. be bold :) --Andeh 17:06, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
      • Comment Fair play to you sir. Just don't let the likes of Uncle G catch you. --IslaySolomon 17:10, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as unverifiable vanity unless reliable sources are provided to back up the article's claims. --Allen3 ^talk 16:53, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete as patent nonsense. And I'm not afraid to deem it so. YMMV. --DarkAudit 16:57, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• Megadelete and smash with a glass hammer --Macarion 17:09, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• Endorse Speedy Deletion Falls under CSD A7. Yanksox 17:19, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.