Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim and Cindie Travis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Bobet 10:44, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Tim and Cindie Travis

Tim and Cindie Travis (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Fails to meet the requirements of WP:BIO. -- Longhair\^talk 23:02, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Longhair\^talk 23:06, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Keep I feel that the publicity they have engendered, together with their publications, makes them notable.--Anthony.bradbury 23:19, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. There is one story from a reliable source on "Tim Travis" bicycle which is linked on the article. The other links don't meet the reliable source test. Google News Archive comes up with nothing which suggests that their trip hasn't had much coverage outside the OC Register. [1]. Capitalistroadster 01:32, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Peta 08:54, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Per Capitalroadster, I don't think the coverage of this couple and their travels is sufficient. They've published a book that might become notable at some point, but no evidence of that so far. Mangojuice^talk 16:43, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Insufficient assertion of notability. According to the article, this isn't even a charity stunt, just two people tooling around the world on bikes. Caknuck 17:04, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.