Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Rogers (writer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was del mikka (t) 01:40, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Tim Rogers (writer)

Obvious self-promotion by a freelance journalist of little note. Recommend deletion. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.44.219.212 (talk • contribs) .

Orphaned AfD. —ERcheck @ 01:17, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy delete as non-notable biography (CSD A7). Tagged. SYCTHOS^talk 01:44, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Userfy if necessary. SYCTHOS^talk 01:44, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. All of us here wikipedians are just on the same level of journalism and notability. We have user pages for this kind of brag. BTW, there is no User:Tim Rogers , nowhere to userfy. Let him/her userfy xeself. mikka (t) 02:16, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete preferably speedy. A writer on the Internet and the article questions the information published by Rogers which raises concerns about verifiability. Capitalistroadster 02:21, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy A7: nn vanity bio and how Deiz 02:49, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
• Society for the Protection of Wikipedian Journalists: Please do not speedy until he's been researched further, or the AfD concludes, whichever is first. Adrian Lamo · (talk) · (mail) · 07:24, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete per Sycthos. Ardenn 07:29, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
• Sepedy Delete per above. Eusebeus 08:01, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep He isn't just a "internet journalist" he writes for several magazines and is a fairly big name in the video game journalism industry. He's quite notable for being one of the fore-runners of the new games journalism movement. Kobyn 09:09, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy keep, notable journalist. Niche notability, exactly -- the sort of thing a process like AfD performs poorly on. Adrian Lamo · (talk) · (mail) · 09:30, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

That's one vote; SPOWJ was a comment :) Adrian Lamo · (talk) · (mail) · 09:32, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete but not speedy as notability is asserted. Just not, I'm afraid, terribly convincingly. I removed the speedy tag. Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] 10:27, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - insufficiently notable. --Whouk (talk) 11:05, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete not notable enough Prodego ^talk 13:31, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable enough. --Terence Ong (恭喜发财) 14:17, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.