Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Lees (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Pigman☿ 05:41, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Tim Lees

Tim_Lees (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

Lack of third person sources to prove notability WP:BIO,WP:RS, Dwanyewest (talk) 21:54, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 08:05, 13 May 2008 (UTC)--Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 08:05, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Question - does appearing on a National TV series and competing in the World Freestyle competion make him notable? If so, then Keep Bettia (talk) 11:32, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Slightly reluctant Delete. Can't find reliable 3rd party sources on google, fails WP:N. Many MANY people have appeared on National TV series, and won game shows/competitions. The competition is not notable enough to justify his inclusion, I feel, as the World Nike Freestyle Competition does not merit its own article, let alone articles for its competitors. Paulbrock (talk) 20:23, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
    • Fair enough - delete Bettia (talk) 08:26, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Question - why is this showing as a 2nd nomination? Paulbrock (talk) 20:23, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

There are no third person sources to prove this individual's notablity we can't have information on blind faith or give the benefit of the doubt without evidence surely? Dwanyewest (talk) 07:50, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete due to few or no third-party sources. Stifle (talk) 18:58, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
  • You guys cannot be serious. Palle is worldwide known as worlds best football freestyler. Its like taking Pele of wikipedia. shame on you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Boomsjakie (talk • contribs) 15:29, 15 May 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.