Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Ingold

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted as copyvio. ⇒ SWATJester ^{On Belay!} 04:29, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Tim Ingold

Tim Ingold (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Copy and paste job, badly referenced, possible copyright violation, also nominating Taskscape.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 00:43, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions. -- Pete.Hurd 01:54, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. It's not well written, is too long, and gives far too much information about his biography rather than his significance. However, it is verifiable, much is neutral point of view, and the original research can be pared down. The man was editor of Man for 2 years. That alone would make him notable. Interlingua ^{talk email} 02:49, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete. Copyvio. Changes from original text are very minor and huge chunks are word-for-word the same. WjBscribe 04:16, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.