Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Hatfield
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 03:44, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Tim Hatfield
You'd think that such a celebrity would have some Google hits. Well, there is one, this Australian blog page. [1] I am getting so tired of these hoax pages. NawlinWiki 20:42, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as hoax, mention of high school and 2006 are immediate flags. Mention of the blog is the topping. Yanksox 21:11, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete - no hits on the BBC website. BlueValour 22:51, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - appears to be a hoax. - Richardcavell 02:59, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Interestingly, an Australian-New Zealand media index comes up with no mentions of this Aussie boy supposedly made good in London. Further, the fact that he does not appear on the BBC website when he is supposedly a high-profile presenter on the network also indicates serious problems with the verifiabiability of this article. Capitalistroadster 03:17, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Capitalistroadster 03:17, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Blog page says it all, he is a teenager who just wants to have a page on wikipedia. hence, the hoax of course. Ansell 07:23, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete per User:Ansell. Frankchn 11:34, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete as above. --Roisterer 11:42, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as hoax, quite elaborate but not one single verifiable fact. --Canley 14:40, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
The article was written by either Josh Behn or Peter Cirocco due to the nagative feelings they feel towards Tim and my self. it is cleary, false and should be removed —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 124.177.186.86 (talk • contribs) .
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.